Pakistan Vs. Balohistan February 15, 2012
Posted by Malik Siraj Akbar in Op-Ed.Tags: Baloch Republican Party, Malik Siraj Akbar, Sangat Sana, US congressional hearing on Balochistan
add a comment
Pakistan has further accelerated violence against its ethnic Baloch minority following an unprecedentedhearing of the U.S. House Committee on Foreign Affairs which voiced deep concern over the appalling human rights violations allegedly committed by the army in the country’s largest province of Balochistan. While Pakistan’s foreign office, the embassy in Washington, D.C. and the National Assembly passed a unanimous resolutionwhich “strongly condemned” the hearing by terming it “blatant interference” of the United States into its ‘internal matters,’ rogue intelligence agencies linked to the godlike military have chosen a ruthless path to vent retribution.
On Feb. 13, the bullet-riddled dead body of Sangat Sana Baloch, 27, a prominent leader of the secular Baloch Republican Party (BRP), was dumped in a desolate southern district of Balochistan. The young leader had ‘disappeared’ on Dec. 7, 2009, from a town 50 kilometers away from Quetta, the capital of the gas and gold-rich Balochistan. Considering the pattern of the young leader’s mysterious disappearance which matched with hundreds of previously documented similar cases, Sana’s party pointed fingers at Pakistan’s infamous Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), the secret wing of the army, and its affiliates, for killing the opposition leader.
Sana had been shot 30 times to the head and chest by his captors, family members said.
“This is Islamabad’s reaction to the congressional hearing in Washington which highlighted Pakistan’s crimes against the Baloch,” says Abdul Qadir Baloch, vice chairman of the Voice for the Missing Baloch Persons, a community-based organization comprising of the family members of hundreds of missing activists. The 60-year old-former bank employee joined the campaign after his own 35-year-old son Jalil Reki, BRP’s central information secretary, was whisked away by, he alleges, the spymasters on Feb. 13, 2009.
The BRP demands a separate homeland for the Baloch people.
After two year’s disappearance, Reki’s tortured dead body was eventually thrown on the roadside after Mr. Baloch snubbed official threats to give up the movement seeking the release of the missing persons.
There were no official charges against Mr. Baloch’s son, nor was the latter ever produced before a court of law in these two years to legally defend himself. Pakistan’s judiciary lacks the teeth to bite army agents who abuse their official powers.
In a June 2011 report, the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP), an independent nonpartisan rights watchdog, said the enforced disappearances had created an “acute climate of fear” amongst the civilians and had contributed to the growing alienation of the people from the state and hatred towards the security forces and intelligence agencies under the control of the Pakistan military.
“Young men between 16 to 25 years of age were being particularly targeted. Many of them were either students or unemployed youth. Some of the incidents indicated random picking up of young men, for example, from picnic spots and markets,” reported the HRCP after conducting extensive field research in the conflict-stricken province.
Pakistani authorities have remained engaged since 2004 in brutally suppressing an indigenous uprising, led by the native Balochs, which calls for an end to exploitation and manipulation of their mineral wealth by the dominant Punjabis. What began as a mere demand for maximum internal autonomy until recently, brutal state violence has taken the movement to a point of no-return where the irreconcilable young Balochs seek absolute independence.
The Congressional sub-committee hearing flabbergasted Pakistan by fully backing the Baloch right to self-determination arguing that people had a right to liberate themselves from abusive governments such as Pakistan’s vis-a-vis the Baloch.
“Balochistan deserves our attention because it is a turbulent land marked by human rights violations committed by regimes that are hostile to America’s interests and values,” said GOP Congressman Dana Rohrabacher, who chaired the hearing which was attended by another four Congressmen.
In the aftermath of the hearing, which spotted the loopholes in Pakistan’s justice and governance system, Islamabad — Washington’s inconsistent ally in the war on terror — has not made any promises to work with the international community to steadily halt arbitrary disappearances, torture and targeted killings of political opponents. Instead, diplomats, politicians and even the media in Pakistan have joined hands in calling brutalities against the Baloch as “Pakistan’s internal matter.”
Ironically, Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan, Pakistan’s leader of the opposition, moved a resolution in the parliament on Feb. 13 against the hearing where Human Rights Watch and the Amnesty International representatives also testified and confirmed the misuse of state power against innocent civilians.
Describing the congressional hearing as “totally unacceptable” and “ill-informed,” the Pakistani parliament urged the U.S. Administration to play “a more proactive role” to discourage such events in the future.
“This House strongly condemns the blatant interference in Pakistan’s internal affairs evidenced by U.S. Congressional Foreign Relations Sub-Committee hearing on Balochistan on 8th February, 2012… the holding of such a hearing… cannot but jeopardize the healing process and further inflame public opinion against the U.S. by adding to the prevailing sense of mistrust and suspicion regarding U.S. intentions towards Pakistan,” the resolution warned.
Despite Pakistan’s condemnation of the congressional hearing, U.S. ambassador to Pakistan, Cameron Munter, has repeatedly expressed concern over human rights issues in Balochistan.
“There is no doubt that people in Balochistan are facing human rights abuses,” he said in a fresh interviewwith a Pakistani newspaper. “U.S. administration should take up the ‘alarming issue’ [of Balochistan] with Pakistani leaders. This is an important issue for us to be discussing with the Pakistani government.”
Ali Dayan Hasan, Pakistan Director at the Asia Division of the Human Rights Watch, who also testified on Feb. 8, takes a blunt position against Pakistan’s objections. He says certain human rights violations, such as torture, do not fall in the category of nations’ “internal matter.” According to him, Pakistan, in spite of being a signatory of the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and Convention Against Torture, is not fulfilling its obligations in Balochistan.
“We do not subscribe to the argument that criticizing human rights abusers is interference in internal affairs,” he says, “Torture is a very serious crime which falls under universal jurisdiction … any act of torture or torturer can be held accountable anywhere in the world.”
Mr. Hasan warns Islamabad, “You can’t kill your own people and then call it an internal affair. As long as there is no reaction on the part of the Pakistani government to our reports and recommendations, we will continue to highlight human rights abuses because this is our job and mandate.”
While the Congressional hearing has helped to bring the Balochistan conflict in spotlight, it has also increased the risk of more state-sponsored violence and torture against the Balochs. Seen in the backdrop of the post-hearing killings, the future in Balochistan looks bloody and murky. The congressional event and official expression of deep concern have, unfortunately, generated false but extremely unrealistic expectations among the Baloch youth who have hastily concluded that the U.S. has probably made up its mind to support their “freedom struggle” against Pakistan.
Given the complicated and unmanageable relationship the United States has had with Pakistan, it is clear that Washington enjoys very limited influence on Pakistan. For instance, it has failed to press Pakistan to act like a responsible partner in the War on Terror by cutting links with Islamic terrorist groups. Therefore, it is too naive to hope that the U.S. can truly play a crucial role in ending human rights violations in Balochistan.
Having said that, the U.S. congressional committee, which began the hearing, should now take more responsibility by advancing this initiative to its logical destination by discussing the issue with a broader community of policymakers, defenders of democracy and human rights activists. Dropping the Balochistan issue by the U.S. Congress will remarkably hurt the Baloch who will bear the brunt of what Georgetown University’s C. Christine Fair billed as a “congressional stunt.”
The Obama administration should not suffice with expressing ‘concern’ over the situation in Balochistan. With the testimonies provided by the HRW and Amnesty International, the administration should seriously see what it can do, considering its own limited influence on Pakistan, to stop rights violations and help find out a peaceful political solution to the Balochistan imbroglio.
The administration must not ignore the Baloch because they matter in the region due to their geo-strategic position. After all, they are a secular people surrounded by three countries — Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan — with a staunch inclination toward radical Islam. By weakening the secular Balochs, Pakistan wants to convert Balochistan into a rich soil and a breeding ground for Islamic fundamentalists from all over the world. (Courtesy: The Huffington Post)
The End of Insurgency? August 24, 2011
Posted by Malik Siraj Akbar in Malik Siraj Akbar.Tags: Baloch armed resistance, Baloch National Front, Baloch Republican Party, Bramdagh Bugti, Carlotta Gall
6 comments
Baloch nationalist leader Bramdagh Bugti, 30, has spoken for the first time since fleeing from Afghanistan to seek asylum in Switzerland. The New York Times has not only run a fresh profile-like story about Mr. Bugti but also shared an unseen picture of the popular guerrilla leader.
In the fresh get-up, Mr. Bugti looks like a Citibank executive.
There was nothing new in the interview except one striking quote:
“Though Mr. Bugti says he supports only peaceful political activism rather than armed resistance, he does share the rebels’ demand for independence for the Baluch.”
In the past Bramdagh clearly supported the Baloch armed resistance movement by justifying it under the umbrella of “self-defence” although there is no public evidence of his direct association with any armed groups.
The Baloch Republican Party (BRP), a political outfit which was founded by Mr. Bugti rejected parliamentary politics but always offered unconditional support to the Baloch armed groups locally known as sarmachars. [Freedom fighters]
Bramdagh’s BRP had recently pulled out of the pro-resistance-until-independence Baloch National Front (BNF), a group of different political organizations and civil rights groups because of latter’s scathing and consistent criticism of the Balochistan National Party.
We also know that Bramdagh has disowned some of his interviews in the past. He may say he’d been misquoted again if his fresh interview generates a new wave of restlessness among his followers.
However, if Mr. Bugti decides to publicly support peaceful struggle over the armed resistance in the future, this will tremendously upset the ongoing Baloch insurgency mainly in Jaffarabad, Naseerabad, Kohlu, Sibi and Dera Bugti districts on the borders of Sindh and Punjab provinces.
Bramdagh’s charisma is more widespread than his grandfather’s, Nawab Akbar Bugti. He is extremely loved by middle class educated youth all over the province. His withdrawal from supporting the armed resistance, if it ever happens, will be a crucial milestone in the current movement?
We have to wait and see whether it was a misquote or a policy change from Mr. Bugti, a message for which he chose a major global publication like the New York Times as the channel.
Cases against Bramdagh Bugti, Dr. Allah Nizar, 87 others withdraw December 10, 2009
Posted by Malik Siraj Akbar in Malik Siraj Akbar.Tags: Aghaz-e-Hoqooq-e-Balochistan (AHB), Baloch, Baloch Hal, Baloch Republican Party, Balochistan, Balochistan National Party, Balochistan's first online newspaper, Bramdagh Bugti, Dr. Allah Nizar, Dr. Hakeem Lehri, English newspapers of Balochistan, Malik Siraj Akbar, Sardar Akhtar Mengal Mengal, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani, withdrawl of cases against Baloch leaders
2 comments
By Malik Siraj Akbar
QUETTA:
The government of Balochistan on Wednesday announced the withdrawal of 89 cases registered against different Baloch nationalist leaders, including Nawabzada Bramdagh Bugti, Sardar Akhtar Mengal and Jamil Bugti, in an effort to reconcile with the annoyed leaders of Balochistan.According to official sources, Chief Minister Nawab Mohammad Aslam Raisani immediately issued orders to meet with the directives issued by Prime Minister Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani following his speech in the National Assembly that politically-motivated cases against the Baloch leaders should be withdrawn. All cases dating back to year 2000 have been taken back by the government against the nationalist leaders.
The biggest surprise came after the government agreed to withdraw cases against Nawabzada Bramdagh Bugti, the chief of Baloch Republican Party (BRP) whom Islamabad accuses of having taken shelter in Afghanistan and operating with the alleged support of India. Previously, the federal government, while unveiling the Balochistan package, had refused to give concession to leaders who were wanted in “terrorist cases” and Bramdagh Bugti had been categorized among such leaders allegedly responsible for creating law and order problems in Balochistan.
The government has also decided to withdraw cases against former Balochistan chief minister and the president of the Balochistan National Party (BNP) Sardar Akhtar Mengal, Jamil Akbar Bugti, a son of Nawab Akbar Bugti, Dr. Allah Nizar, a former chairman of the Baloch Students’ Organization (BSO) who is believed to be the mastermind of the Baloch armed resistance in Awaran area.
However, several Baloch leaders against whom cases were withdrawn rejected the government initiative by terming it as an effort to mitigate the Baloch nationalistic movement which intends to seek independence of Balochistan.
Habib Jalib Baloch, secretary general of the Balochistan National Party (BNP) against whom the government withdrew a case entailing sedition, told the Baloch Hal a similar promise of taking cases back had been made by chief minister Nawab Raisani when he took over but those cases still existed against the Baloch leaders.
- Hide quoted text -
“Today (Wednesday) I appeared before a court in Quetta to face sedition charges because of a speech I had made in Panjgur. My party Chief Sardar Akhtar Mengal has also been implicated in this case,” he said, “how come the government continues to run cases against us in different courts and tell the media that these cases are taken back?”
As the BNP secretary general demanded more confidence building measures to be taken by the government, he was reminded of the official decision to deploy the Frontier Corps in place of the army at Kohlu cantonment. In response Jalib said there was no difference between the military and the Frontier Corps. According to him, the Balochistan military operation is being unleashed by the army, FC, law enforcement agencies and intelligence services collectively.
“We have no faith in the government. We want the deployment of the United Nations pace keeping forces in Balochistan so that peace is maintained,” he suggested, adding that the government must release 992 missing persons as officially confirmed. The BNP senior leader also demanded the complete cancellation of Gwadar Port and Sandik Copper project as they were, in his words, “anti-Baloch” projects.
Dr. Abdul Hakeem Lehri, a member of the Central Committee of the Baloch Republican Party (BRP), said he was not sure what case had actually been registered against him. He added that he had no regrets in speaking against the country as he did not view Pakistan his country.
“Our stance is very clear that we are fighting for the independence of Balochistan. We do not care about the registration or withdrawal of cases. We do not understand why the government withdrew the cases against us when we never requested for it nor did we ever feel guilty about it,” he said.
Dr. Lehri said the government was “joking” with the Balochs by offering them packages and amnesty. He complained that a central leader of his party, Sangat Sana, had been whisked away by the intelligence agencies days after the announcement of the Balochistan package by the federal government.
Baloch Bar Association President, Sadiq Raisani, against whom the government also decided to withdraw cases, said he was feeling very proud that the government had to finally surrender before him. “I do not mind if 200 cases are registered against me if talking for separation is a crime. I have no regrets over my anti-Pakistan activities,” he remarked.
Other such leaders against whom the government withdrew cases, Shahzaib Baloch, president of Quetta zone of the Baloch Students Organization (BSO), rejected the government decision saying that their steadfastness had finally compelled the government to take the cases back against him and several other Baloch leaders.
“The government must not live under illusion that it will weaken Balochistan’s war of resistance and separation by offering packages and amnesty. We are a nation that is proud of giving sacrifices for its motherland. Cases do not mean anything to us,” he warned.
Zaib, who had been whisked away allegedly by the state intelligence agencies earlier this year for two months, said he viewed the official decision as a landmark achievement for him as he had forced the government to surrender before his determination.
According to the government announcement, cases have been withdrawn against Dr. Bashir Azeem Baloch, secretary general of the Baloch Republican Party (BRP), Dr. Abdul Hayee Baloch, former president of the National Party (NP), Senator Lashkari Raisani, Balochistan president of the Pakistan People’s Party, Asif Baloch of the Baloch Students Organization, Abid Shah (BSO), Gulzar Baloch (BSO), Amanullah Baloch (BSO), Shakar Bibi (Baloch Womens’ Panel-BWP), Farida Baloch (BWP), Farzana Baloch (BWP), Dr. Hani Baloch (BWP), Gul Bibi Baloch (BWP), Agha Hassan Baloch (BNP), Sikandar Kurd (BRP), Sohail Rajpoot (Jamori Watan Party), Ayaz Swathi (Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz), Usman Kakar (PKMP), Hamid Achakzai (PKMP), Abdul Rahim Ziaratwal (PKMP) and Nasarullah Zeray (PKMP)
Among these 89 cases, 46 were registered in Quetta, 15 in Khuzdar, 4 in Gwadar and Panjgur each, 3 in Nasirabad, Kalat and Kech respectively, 2 in Qila Saifullah and Lasbela each while one in Qila Abdullah, Noshaki, Kharan and Awaran.
Return of the natives December 1, 2009
Posted by Malik Siraj Akbar in Malik Siraj Akbar.Tags: Baloch, Baloch Republican Party, Baloch Students Organization, Balochistan, Balochistan package, enforced disappearances in Balochistan, Malik Siraj Akbar, missing persons of Balochistan
add a comment
By Malik Siraj Akbar
The government has released at least twenty “missing persons” from different parts of Balochistan. This has come as a follow-up of the recently announced Balochistan Package by Prime Minister Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani. The PM promised that many of the missing persons would be celebrating Eid with their family members. The total number of lucky ones who managed to meet their family members and added to their Eid jubilations is only twenty.
According to initial reports, the recently released missing political activists include Dr. Dost Mohammad and Shaukat Langov of the National Party. Another two activists of the Baloch Students Organization (BSO), Saleem Langove and Organzaib have also been resurfaced. Furthermore, a resident of Noshkai district, Mir Ahmed Bugti, who was picked up earlier in April this year, has reached home too. In addition, around fifteen members of the Bugti tribe have resurfaced and reportedly arrived at their respective homes.
The release of only twenty missing persons is even a welcome move by the government. After all, the issue of enforced disappearances has been a major source of unrest and anguish among the Balochs. Several innocent families have been devastated by the disappearance of their beloved ones. The case of disappearances is very serious for the reasons that the missing persons are not kept in a regular jail or produced before a court of law to be given a dignified legal trial. Their families are barred from meeting them or at least know the whereabouts of their disappeared family members.
The government has, however, committed a strategic blunder by releasing only some of the missing persons. Firstly, it had been in a constant state of denial for many years about the missing Balochs who were allegedly held in the custody of the intelligence agencies. Most of the missing persons, if they were ever released, disclosed that they were subjected to inhuman and inexplicable torture during their detention inside torture cells at unknown locations.
Interior Minister Rehman Malik had said off and on that no one from Balochistan was in the custody of the intelligence agencies. Ridiculing the Baloch claim of four thousand people’s disappearance, the federal minister said these were “unrealistic” and “exaggerated” figures. One has also heard on a number of occasions by the top officials of the government, including former President General Pervez Musharraf, that these missing persons of Balochistan had gone to Afghanistan and Dubai for various reasons. In return, they charged that the families of these missing persons of maligning the country’s security forces because of their prolonged protest rallies and public demonstrations.
The million dollar question is: Where did these odd twenty missing persons come from? Who arrested them? Where were they kept? Why did they resurface only after the announcement of the Balochistan package? Why they were not brought before the courts? Why are they so terrified to utter a single word to their family and community members about their captors and the kind of questions they were asked? These questions generate more suspicions about the role of the state apparatus. It also gives currency to the Baloch nationalist parties’ claim that thousands of Balochs are still missing and the government has not been truthful about this grave state of human rights violation.
Ironically, the release of twenty people came only after the government exerted some pressure on the powers that be to give it a face-saving by at least releasing some of the disappeared people. Thus, if the government can play a role in getting some people released only to improve its tarnished image then it should also take more similar measures to win the hearts of the disgruntled Balochs by releasing the other missing persons as well.
Many of the families of the missing persons in Balochistan complain that their loved ones have not returned home yet. One has been hearing the names of several prominent figures who have been missing for years and months such as Ali Asghar Bungalzai, Hafiz Saeed Bungalzai, Baloch Republican Party (BRP) secretary information Jalil Reki, Vice Chairman of the Baloch Students Organization Zakir Majeed, Dr. Din Mohammad Baloch and many others whose families have been protesting before various press clubs and the building of Balochistan High Court. Where are the remaining missing persons? If the government knew about the whereabouts of these 20 people who were recently released, it surely has some information about the abovementioned missing persons as well.
Another related mistake made by the government to release twenty missing persons after the announcement of the Balochistan package is the wrong timing for this move. Had the government taken such an initiative before formulating and announcing the Balochistan package, it would remarkably help to win the confidence of Baloch nationalist parties. No doubt, the Baloch political parties would see a little hope to join the dialogue process if they saw the government taking some sincerely measures.
At the moment, the release of twenty missing persons is, unfortunately, going to widen the gulf between the province and the center as the latter had been lying for so many years about the missing persons saying that they were not in the official custody. The Baloch opposition would now seemingly believe that this government is not serious in resolving the Balochistan issue but endeavoring to notch political scores.
While welcoming the release of twenty missing persons, we would like to recommend the government to “do more” in Balochistan regarding the missing persons. The release of the missing persons should not be confined to the members of particular tribes or areas which may lead to speculations that the government is acting on a policy of “divide and rule” in Balochistan. All the missing persons should be released at once in order to pave the way for future dialogue between the province and the center.
Jail me but free my dad November 10, 2009
Posted by Malik Siraj Akbar in Malik Siraj Akbar.Tags: Baloch Republican Party, Balochistan, Jalil Reki, Malik Siraj Akbar, missing persons of Balochistan
2 comments

Beurag Baloch
Meet three-year old Beurag Baloch. He is the son of Jalil Reki, the central secretary information of the Baloch Republican Party (BRP), who went missing since the early days of 2009. Beurag tells us that he believes his father was picked up by the agencies. He does not exactly know what “agencies” mean and what their job is. Yet, he says he misses his “missing father” very much.
His dad is among thousands of Balochs who are currently “missing” after being whisked away by the country’s intelligence agencies. They say some 4000 Balochs have “disappeared” at the moment.
Beurag held my hand and asked me to take his picture pretending to be behind bars in order to convey his willingness to go behind bars in return of his missing father’s release.
“Uncle, can you do me this favor,” he asked this afternoon.
I could not promise but assured to convey his message with his own photograph to everyone that this young child is volunteering to go to Pakistan’s torture cells in return of his father’s release from the custody of the intelligence agencies.
EXCLUSIVE: “If I compromise on Baloch movement, my followers will kill, replace and forget me,” says Bramdagh Bugti September 10, 2009
Posted by Malik Siraj Akbar in Malik Siraj Akbar.Tags: Afghanistan, Baloch, Baloch insurgency, Baloch Liberation Army, Baloch Liberation Front, Baloch National Front, Baloch Republican Party, Balochistan, Balochistan National Party, Dera Bugti, Dr. Abdul Malik Baloch, Exclusive interview of Bramdagh Bugti, Gwadar, India, Indian involvement in Balochistan, Indo-Pak meeting in Sharm el-Sheik, Malik Siraj Akbar, Malik Siraj Akbar interview with Bramdagh Bugti, National Party, Nawab Mohammad Akbar Khan Bugti, Nawab Zulfiqar Ali Magsi, Nawabzada Brahmadagh Bugti, Nawb Mohammad Aslam Raisani, Pakistan, Parliamentry Committee on Balochistan, Prime Minister of Pakistan Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani, Quetta, Sardar Akhtar Mengal, Sharm el-Sheik, Sui, target killings in Quetta, the Balochistan dispute, Turbat
19 comments

Nawabzada Bramdagh Khan Bugti

Nawabzada Bramdagh Khan Bugti

Nawabzada Bramdagh Khan Bugti and Shaeed Nawabzada Balacch Marri

Nawabzada Bramdagh Khan Bugti

Nawabzada Bramdagh Khan Bugti
EXCLUSIVE:
By Malik Siraj Akbar
A confident Baloch guerrilla commander Nawabzada Bramdagh Bugti, 28, believes it is now “impossible” for Islamabad to get him extradited even if he is hiding somewhere in Afghanistan, as claimed by Pakistan’s Interior Minister Rehman Malik, or elsewhere in the wake of increasing “international moral support” the “ Baloch national liberation movement” is attracting because of its “legitimacy”.
Bramdagh, the fiercest face of the Baloch insurgency, is a grandson of late Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti, a former chief minister and governor of Balochistan who was killed by the Pervez Musharraf regime in a military operation on August 26 2006. Since then, the young separatist has taken the command of the armed Baloch fighters who demand an independent Balochistan. While the senior Bugti only demanded provincial autonomy for the gas-rich Balochistan province, Bramdagh differently interprets his grandfather’s dream. He stands for a free and sovereign Balochistan.
Pakistan has been blaming India for supporting Bramdagh’s armed movement via Afghanistan where Islamabad believes this young fighter is currently hiding. The situation in Balochistan has now transformed into a pain in Islamabad’s nick. On his part, the Baloch leader says if he enjoyed international support, he would vanquish his enemy overnight.
In yet another exclusive interview with this writer, the chief of Baloch Republican Party (BRP) and one of the most influential armed commanders of the ongoing Baloch movement once again denied hiding somewhere in Afghanistan. Excerpts:
MALIK SIRAJ AKBAR: How do you feel about possible efforts by Islamabad to pressurize the Afghan government to get you extradited from Afghanistan where you are believed to be currently hiding?
BRAMDAGH BUGTI: I have said it many times that I am not hiding in Afghanistan. I am very much among my Baloch people. With such propaganda, Islamabad is trying to raise non-issues and divert attention from the actual objectives and steady success of our struggle for Balochistan’s separation from Pakistan.
Dynamics of international politics have remarkably changed in the recent times. Our consistent armed struggle has proven it to the world that the Balochs are not terrorists but freedom fighters. Today, there is more “moral support” to us from the western media and the civilized world than ever before. Therefore, even if I am hiding in Afghanistan or somewhere in Europe, I am still confident that my hosts, no matter who they are but fully understand what the Baloch movement stands for, will not get me extradited to Pakistan at any cost.
The government of Pakistan had made failed attempts to implicate Hairbayar Marri and Gazin Marri, the sons of Nawab Khair Baksh Marri, in London and Dubai respectively in terrorism charges in the past. These Baloch leaders were tried in the most standard courts of the world where everyone is expected to get equal justice. These courts acquitted the Baloch leaders of terrorism charges and acknowledged that they were only the victims of geo-politics. They had been forced by Pakistan to flee their towns, which had come under intense bombardment, and take shelter either in the Baloch hills or go abroad.
MSA: How popular do you think your movement is internationally?
BB: Blunders committed by Pakistan itself have helped us very much to gain international popularity. When the sons of Nawab Marri were arrested from London and Dubai, the world community was forced have a more realistic look at Balochistan. Luckily, the western media is now covering the Baloch issue more keenly and objectively. The civilized world discreetly buys our demand of control on our resources against a country that is using bombs and tanks on the Baloch population.
MSA: Prime Minister Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani and his Indian counterpart Primer Manmohan Singh recently mentioned the Balochistan issue in Sharm el-Sheikh. What is your reaction to this development?
BB: Pakistan has been trying to muzzle our voice by all available means. Blunders by Islamabad, such as holding India responsible for the prevailing unrest in Balochistan, have only helped us to internationalize our cause. The Baloch movement is purely indigenous without getting substantial foreign assistance. Nonetheless, I would appeal to the international community to come to our help to get us rid off Pakistan.
MSA: How would you define your guerilla war against Islamabad?
BB: Our guerilla war should be viewed in political terms rather than being interpreted as a terrorist movement. We never initiated this war. The government of Pakistan imposed a war on our people. My grandfather, Nawab Bugti, was forthcoming towards reconciliatory efforts but he was driven out of his home. I wish to emphasize that ours is a war in the self-defense. We admit being weaker against a mighty State of Pakistan that has bombs, tanks and helicopters to attack us. Now, our war will continue until we fully achieve our destination of freedom.
MSA: How do see the recently formed Independent Balochistan Council formulated by the Khan of Kalat Mir Suleman Dawood?
BB: I have read about it only in the media. I am not in touch with the Khan of Kalat. However, I deeply admire every sincere effort that is made for an independent Balochistan.
MSA: Let’s assume that you manage to get independence for Balochistan. Do you think an Independent Balochistan is viable?
BB: We keep hearing this propaganda by the Punjabis and Islamabad that an independent Balochistan will not survive. We think differently. The Baloch movement has matured to a large extent. We know the importance of independence. We will preserve it by hook or by crook. The Balochs are so conscious about their rights today that if I compromise on their movement with the Pakistani establishment, my own followers will definitely desert , replace and kill me. Today, our small children refuse to sing Pakistan’s anthem. They burn the “Punjbai flag”. Do you not think this is a significant headway?
I am not an idealist. Like every other movement in the world, the Baloch movement also has its weaknesses and shortcomings. I have never claimed to be running an ideal movement. Challenges are there. But I want to tell Islamabad not to worry about the Balochs. We can manage ourselves. Punjab deprived our people of right to education. We will educate our people. We do not need the sympathies of the Punjab.
MSA: One can see the rise of a Marri- Bugti confederacy in Balochistan. Do you agree? (Recently a son of Nawab Khair Baksh Marri married Bramdagh’s sister)
BB: Marri and Bugtis have lived together for ages. We share borders with each other. More importantly, we believe we are faced with a collective enemy. Therefore, we are more united today and we wish to extend this unity in order to achieve our goals.
However, it would be misleading if you narrowly look at our popular resistance movement to, what you call, a mere “Marri-Bugti confederacy”. Today, Turbat district, where there is no tribal system at all, is the home to separatist movement. After the killing of Ghulam Mohammad Baloch, Lala Munir Baloch and Sher Mohammad Baloch, Turbat has brought itself at par with Dera Bugti and Sui in the resistance movement. Hence, you should know that the movement for an independent Balochistan is equally popular among the people who are well educated and have never lived under tribal system.
MSA: The PPP government has constituted a constitutional committee headed by Senator Raza Rabbani to address the Baloch grievances. What do you say about it?
BB: I have one thing to say about the PPP government: It is suppressing the Balochs more brutally than the Pervez Musharraf regime. There is no let-up in the situation in Balochistan under the PPP government. The military operation is taking place unabated. More cantonments and check posts are being established. (This interview was taken before Balochistan Chief Minister Nawab Mohammad Aslam Raisani’s announcement this week that the federal government had decided to withhold the construction of cantonments in Balochistan, which was a bone of contention between Islamabad and the Baloch nationalists, note by the interviewer) Political activists are being kidnapped and subjected to inhuman treatment. Baloch press is being muzzled. Even then, if someone expects us to still negotiate with the people who ruined our lives then you are not being fair with us.
MSA: But isn’t there still a possibility of confidence building measures? What would your recommend the PPP government to do so that you would agree to negotiate?
BB: Our demands are simple. Withdraw the Punjabi army from Balochistan and declare the independence of Balochistan.
MSA: Your demands are perhaps too high for Islamabad to meet. Can you not compromise on something less than that?
BB: The PPP government has declared a war against us. They want us to negotiate on gun-point which we will never do. Recently, the Herald magazine ran a cover story saying that Dera Bugti was a no-go area. If the area is not under military operation then why does the government not allow entry to the independent media to see the ground realities in that conflict-stricken area?
As far as compromising on something less is concerned, you see our fight with Pakistan is not on water or gas issues. We are fighting for our independence. They have illegally occupied our land. We neither demand anything from them or agree to give anything to Islamabad. Therefore, the best formula for Islamabad is to withdraw from our land and grant us freedom. Once that is done, there would be peace and tranquility in Balochistan. Later on, we will decide about the nature of relations an independent Balochistan would like to keep with Pakistan.
MSA: Your supporters are believed to have kidnapped and subsequently killed around 20 Baloch policemen in Naseerabad district. The local Balochs have expressed their resentment to these killings. Likewise, why are the Baloch separatists target killing the Punjbai teachers in Balochistan?
BB: I do not call the BLA [Baloch Liberation Army] and BRA [Baloch Republican Party] as my supporters. They are my brothers. I fully endorse all their operations. If they resort to extreme actions then they surely have suffered the same level of brutality by the Pakistani forces.
We had formerly warned all the Balochs not to serve in the Pakistani security forces against the Baloch fighters. Likewise, the policemen in Naseerabad, despite being Balochs, were being disloyal to their mother land when they tried to operate against the very people who are struggling for their independence. However, every effort was made to spare the laborers and innocent people who were kidnapped.
As far as the target killing of teachers is concerned, I do not understand why the Pakistani authorities and the media shout only when one Punjabi teacher or barber is killed. Why not a single word is uttered when Baloch towns after towns are bombarded by the Pakistani authorities? I have said it many times: target killings are a justified reaction of the Baloch against the policies of the Punjabi army.
MSA: Doest that mean you endorse these target killings?
BB: I said before that target killings are the reaction to an action. If one Punjabi teacher is killed, one hundred more Balochs are also killed in response by the security forces. The government functionaries destroy all the livelihood of the poor Baloch tribesmen by bombarding their homes, goats and sheep with helicopters and jet airplanes. What are the other ways left for us? Why should we no react?
I was reading an article, which I admire, by a Baloch writer who said we were not carrying out enough target killings. There is a need for more such killings. These killings, according to that writer, should be intensified and expanded to the Punjab. If Panjab does not review its attitude towards the Baloch then I believe the Balochs would be justified to even enter the towns of Punjab to eliminate the Punjabis who are killing the Balochs. So, don’t force us to that extent.
MSA: Now that your cousin Mir Aali Bugit has been elevated as the chief of Bugti tribe and Shahzain Bugti, the son of your uncle Talal Bugti, is also planning to return to Dera Bugti, what is the justification on your part to oppose the Bugti tribe?
BB: Islamabad has had a long policy of divide and rule in Balochistan. It does not surprise me if they pit my cousin against me. This is not a long-term solution to the Baloch problem. When the government took over, it promised to end the military operation in the first four months. On the contrary, today, we are witnessing more violence in Dera Bugti. Neither the military operation has ended nor have the attacks by the Baloch ‘freedom fighters’ declined.
The experiment of brining Mir Aali to Dere Bugti completely failed. The so-called Nawab of Bugti tribe lives amid unprecedented fear and uncertainty. He is afraid of the very people who surround he does not even trust them. He does not allow them to get out of Dera Bugti. If Mir Aali was truly in control of the affairs in the district then why would he not allow the independent media to visit Dera Bugti?
MSA: Balochistan Governor Nawab Zulfiqar Ali Magsi often ridicules your movement by saying that you cannot get independence by burning Pakistani national flag or target killing teachers.
BB: Why are you quoting a man who is paid a salary from Islamabad to speak and act against us? We do not care what Magsi or Raisani have to say about us. Because they are both confused people. Raisani once calls for the deployment of the Frontier Corps and then he tells the Herald that if he were powerful enough, he would drive all the security forces out of Balochistan. Every statement of the Chief Minister contradicts his previous one. We are fighting for a greater cause without caring much what Raisani or Magsi have to say about us.
MSA: Nawab Bugti gave the call for a single Baloch party. You have been asking the Baloch nationalists to give up parliamentary politics. Now, why isn’t your appeal taken seriously by the Balochistan National Party and National Party (NP).
BB: In my views, true nationalistic politics is that of armed resistance. We need to reject (Pakistan’s) parliamentary politics. The Balochs should increase their support for the armed groups. It does not make a big difference if the BNP and NP do not back the forces that vocally demand an independent Balochistan. All I want to tell my people is that we should unite. The government is eliminating the Baloch identity. The sooner we unite the better.
We already have a single Baloch party present in shape of the Baloch National Front (BNF) which is an organized group of around ten political parties. The Baloch people should strengthen the BNF so that our voice for an independent Balochistan becomes clear and loud enough for our people and the rest of the world.
MSA: Do you think your movement is successfully heading towards its destination?
BB: We are not talking about destination right now. I know it is still too far. So let’s not talk of the percentage of progress that we have made so far in our journey. Nonetheless, I am glad that we are increasingly progressing in our movement in terms of educating our people about the movement. Some years ago, no Baloch could even imagine talking about independence. On the other hand, its reassuring that our women and small children today hate Pakistan and fearlessly demand an independent Balochistan. Is this not a remarkable change in a country where dissent is stringently crushed? If we compare the level of consciousness among the Baloch with what was there on the ground three years ago, then one can conclude that we are gradually winning.
I am not anti-tribalism: Bramdagh Bugti September 5, 2009
Posted by Malik Siraj Akbar in Malik Siraj Akbar.Tags: Baloch, Baloch Republican Party, Balochistan, Balochistan insurgency, Dera Bugti, Government of Balochistan, interview of Bramdagh Bugti, Malik Siraj Akbar, Mushahid Hussain Syed, Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti, Nawab Mohammad Akbar Khan Bugti, Nawabzada Bramdagh Bugti, peace process in Balochistan, Quetta, Sui, Weekly Hum Shehri
4 comments

میں قبائلی نظام کا مخالف نہیں ہوں“
جنگ مسلط کی گئی…
حکومت اپنے اقدامات سے ثابت کرے کہ وہ حل کے لیے سنجیدہ ہے“
انٹرویو: ملک سراج اکبر
براہمداغ بگٹی ترک پارلیمان کی سوچ رکھنے والی بلوچ ری پبلکن پارٹی (بی آر پی) کے سربراہ ہیں اور 2006ء میں اپنے داد ا کی ہلاکت کے بعد سے روپوش ہو کر صوبے میں ایک مسلح تحریک چلار ہے ہیں۔ انھوں نے حال ہی میں” ہم شہر ی“ کو ایک خصوصی انٹرویو دیا جو کہ قارئین کی خدمت میں حاضرہے۔
ہم شہری: حکومت ِ پاکستان کا الزام ہے کہ آپ افغانستان میں بیٹھ کربھارت کی مدد سے بلوچستان میں علیحدگی کی تحریک چلارہے ہیں۔ کیا آپ کو نہیں لگتا کہ پاکستانی حکومت کابل پر دباؤ ڈال کر کسی وقت بھی آپ کو وہاں سے ملک بدر کر سکتی ہے؟
براہمداغ بگٹی: میں ماضی میں بھی کئی بار اس بات کی وضاحت کرچکا ہوں کہ میں افغانستان یا کسی اور ملک میں نہیں ہوں بلکہ میں اس وقت بھی بلوچستان میں اپنے لوگوں کے درمیان ہی روپوش ہوں۔ میں کوئی بیوقوف نہیں ہوں کہ لوگوں کو کھلے عام بتا دوں کہ میں کہاں چھپاہوا ہوں تاکہ میرے ساتھ وہی سلوک کیا جائے جو” پنجابی فوج“ نے میرے دادا نواب محمد اکبر خان بگٹی کے ساتھ کیا تھا۔ نواب صاحب تو مذاکرات کے لیے بھی راضی تھے اور ان کی ملاقاتیں چوہدری شجاعت حسین اور مشاہد حسین سیدکے ساتھ ہوئیں لیکن اس کاصلہ انھیں یہ ملا کہ انھیں ایک فوجی آپریشن میں مار دیا گیا اور ان کی میت تک ان کے گھر والوں کے سپرد نہیں کی گئی ۔
حکومت میرے افغانستان یا کسی اور دوسرے ملک میں روپوش ہونے کا شوشہ پھیلا کر د رحقیقت بلوچستان کے اصل مسئلے سے لوگوں کی توجہ ہٹا نا چاہتی ہے کہ یہاں ہم بلوچ اپنی آزادی اور پاکستان سے علیحدگی کی جنگ لڑ رہے ہیں۔ تاہم میں اس بات میں کوئی قباحت محسوس نہیں کرتا کہ میں افغانستان یا کسی دوسرے ملک میں چلا جاؤں۔ البتہ میں ایک بات وثوق سے کہہ سکتا ہوں کہ اب عالمی سیاست کے انداز بدل گئے ہیں اور حکومت پاکستان کے لیے مجھے کہیں سے ملک بدر کرنا ممکن نہیں ہے رہا ۔ میں اگر افغانستان یا یورپ میں چلا جاؤں تو مجھے یقین ہے کہ جو لوگ بلوچ مسئلے سے آگا ہ ہیں وہ مجھے پاکستان کے حوالے ہرگز نہیں کریں گے کیوں کہ اب پوری دنیا کو پتہ چل گیا ہے کہ بلوچ ایک جائز جنگ لڑرہے ہیں جو ان پر خود پاکستان نے مسلط کی ہے۔ اب عالمی سطح پر لوگ ہمارے موٴقف کی حمایت کررہے ہیں اور اس جھوٹے حکومتی پراپیگنڈے کو مستر دکر رہے ہیں کہ ہم دہشت گر د ہیں۔
ماضی میں حکومت نے اسی طرح کے بے بنیاد الزامات بزر گ بلوچ قوم پرست رہنما نواب خیر بخش مری کے فرزندوں نوابزادہ حیربیار مری اورگزین مری پر بھی لگائے تھے ۔ مذکورہ بلوچ رہنماؤں کو جب لند ن اور دبئی کی بااختیار عدالتوں میں پیش کیا گیا تو ان کے خلاف کوئی بھی جرم ثابت نہیں ہوسکا۔ ہم لوگوں کو خود پاکستانی فوج نے ہمارے گھروں سے بے دخل کرکے پہاڑوں پر جاکر ہتھیار اٹھانے پر مجبور کیا ہے۔ ہمارے گاؤں کے گاؤں بمباری سے تباہ و برباد کر دیے گئے ہیں۔ ہمارے لوگوں کو در بدری کی زندگی گزارنے پر مجبور کیا گیا۔
ہم شہری: وفاقی حکومت نے سینیٹر رضا ربانی کی قیادت میں بلوچستان کے مسئلے کے حل کے لیے ایک پارلیمانی کمیٹی بنائی ہے جس نے اپنی پندرہ نکاتی سفارشات وزیراعظم سید یوسف رضا گیلانی کو پیش کی ہیں جو قبول بھی ہو چکی ہیں، تو کیا آپ حکومت کی طرف سے شروع کردہ اس مذاکراتی عمل کو خوش آئند قرار دے کر اس کا حصہ نہیں بنیں گے؟
براہمداغ بگٹی: میں سمجھتا ہوں کہ بلوچستان میں اس وقت جتنے مظالم بلوچوں پر ڈھائے جارہے ہیں اس کی نظیر پرویز مشرف کے دور حکومت میں بھی نہیں ملتی ۔ پی پی پی سابقہ حکومت کی جارحانہ پالیسیوں کا تسلسل جاری رکھے ہوئے ہے اور بلوچستان میں تاحال فوجی آپریشن جاری ہے اور سیاسی کارکنان کی ماروائے عدالت گرفتاری روز کا معمول بن چکی ہے۔ حکومت چیک پوسٹوں کی تعداد میں بدستور اضافہ کررہی ہے اور اس کے باوجود اگر آپ سمجھتے ہیں کہ ہم حکومت کے ساتھ بیٹھ کر مذاکرات کریں گے تو یقینا آپ ہمارے ساتھ انصاف نہیں کر رہے۔ دوسری بات یہ ہے کہ ہم اپنی آزادی کی جنگ لڑر ہے ہیں نہ کہ صوبائی خود مختاری کی ۔ مذاکرات دو فریقین کے درمیان صرف اس وقت ہوسکتے ہیں جب وہ کچھ دو اور کچھ لو کی پالیسی کے تحت کسی چیز پر تصفیہ کررہے ہیں۔ ہم پاکستان سے کچھ مانگ رہے ہیں اور نہ ہی اسے کچھ دینے کو تیار ہیں۔ ہمارا موٴقف ہے کہ آپ ( اسلام آباد) ہمار ے گھر میں بطور حملہ آور داخل ہوئے ہیں اور ہمیں بزور قوت اپنے ساتھ ملایا ہوا ہے۔ اب ہم چاہتے ہیں کہ آپ ہمارے گھر سے نکل جائیں اور ہماری آزادی کا اعلا ن کریں۔ اس کے علاوہ ہمارا پاکستان کے ساتھ کوئی جھگڑا نہیں ہے۔ اس کے بعد ہم فیصلہ کریں گے کہ ہم پاکستان کے ساتھ کیسے تعلقات رکھتے ہیں۔
ہم شہری: تو کیا اس کا یہ مطلب لیا جائے کہ آپ نے مذاکرات کے تمام دروازے بند کر دیے ہیں؟ کیا ایسا نہیں ہوسکتا کہ آپ حکومت کو بحالی اعتماد کی خاطر چند ٹھوس تجاویز دے دیں تا کہ ان پر عمل در آمد کرکے حکومت مذاکراتی عمل کی کامیابی کو یقینی بنائے۔
براہمداغ بگٹی: ہم حالت جنگ میں ہیں اور بندوق کی نو ک پرحکومت کے ساتھ ہرگز مذاکرات نہیں کریں گے۔ حال ہی میں ”ہیرالڈ“ نے ایک کوراسٹوری میں بتایا کہ ڈیرہ بگٹی ابھی تک ایک ”نو گو ایریا“ ہے۔ حکومت کو چاہیے کہ اپنے اقدامات سے ثابت کرے کہ وہ بلوچستان کے مسئلے کے حل کے لیے سنجیدہ ہے۔ میرے خیال میں اگر پی پی پی مسائل کے حل میں مخلص ہو بھی تو اس کے پاس اختیار ات نہیں ہیں کہ وہ بلوچستان کے مسئلے کو حل کرے۔ پاکستانی فوج اور اسٹیبلشمنٹ بلوچستان کے مسئلے کو حل نہیں کرنا چاہتے۔ سب سے پہلے ”پنجابی فوج“ کو بلوچستان سے مکمل طور پر نکل جانا چاہیے ، گرفتار سیاسی کارکنان اور عام بلوچوں کو رہا کیا جائے، فوجی آپریشن کا فی الفور خاتمہ کیا جائے اور چھاؤنیوں و چیک پوسٹوں کے قیام کا عمل روک دیا جائے ۔ تب کہیں جاکر ہم سوچیں گے کہ آیا اب ہم حکومت کے ساتھ بات کریں یا نہیں۔آیا ہم پاکستان کے ساتھ رہنا چاہتے ہیں یا نہیں؟ اس کا فیصلہ اس وقت ہوگا جب ہماری ان شرائط پر عمل درآمد کیا جائے گا۔ اس سے کم پر ہم ہرگز مذاکرات نہیں کریں گے۔
ہم شہری: آپ پر الزام ہے کہ آپ کو بھارت مالی امداد کررہا ہے۔
براہمداغ بگٹی:میری پوری عالمی برادری بشمول بھارت، امریکہ ، اقوام متحدہ اور یورپی یونین سے گزارش ہے کہ وہ پاکستان کے خلاف ہماری ہر ممکن مدد کریں تاکہ ہم اس ریاست سے جلد از جلد نجات حاصل کریں۔ فی الحال تو ہمیں کسی طرح کی بین الاقوامی امداد نہیں مل رہی جس کے باعث ہم ظلم کی چکی میں پِس رہے ہیں ۔ اگر پاکستان امریکی ہتھیار بلوچوں کے خلاف استعمال کرسکتاہے تو اس میں کیا عیب ہے کہ بلوچ بھی عالمی امداد کی اپیل کریں؟ لیکن آپ کے سوال کے جواب میں صرف اتناکہوں گا کہ اس وقت ہمیں کوئی بیرونی امداد نہیں مل رہی۔ اگر ہمیں پیشکش کی جاتی ہے تو ہم کھلے دل سے اس امداد کو قبول کریں گے کیوں کہ ہم مظلوم ہیں اور اپنے دفاع کی جنگ لڑ رہے ہیں۔
ہم شہری: حال ہی میں شرم الشیخ میں وزیراعظم سید یوسف رضا گیلانی اور ان کے بھارتی ہم منصب من موہن سنگھ کے درمیان طے پانے والے سمجھوتے میں پہلی مرتبہ بلوچستان میں مبینہ بھارتی مداخلت کا ذکرآیا ہے۔آپ اس پیش رفت کو کیسے دیکھتے ہیں؟
براہمداغ بگٹی:اگرچہ میں پہلے بھی کہہ چکا ہوں کہ ہمیں کوئی بیرونی امداد نہیں مل رہی لیکن میں سمجھتا ہوں کہ حکومت پاکستان کی ان حماقتوں کی وجہ سے ( جیسا کہ شرم الشیخ میں بھارت کے ساتھ بلوچستان کے مسئلے کو اٹھا تے وقت دیکھنے میںآ یا)بلوچ قومی تحریک کو بے پناہ بین الاقوامی مقبولیت حاصل ہوئی ہے۔ اسی طرح جب حکومت ِ پاکستان نے برطانوی حکومت سے مطالبہ کیا کہ نوابزادہ حیربیار مری کو گرفتار کرکے ان کے خلاف دہشت گردی کا مقدمہ چلایا جائے تو اس کا براہ راست فائدہ بلوچوں کو ہوا۔ اب ماضی کے مقابلے میں زیادہ تر لوگ عالمی سطح پر بلوچ مسئلے سے آشنا ہورہے ہیں اور مغربی ذرائع ابلاغ میں ہماری حالت زار پر ماضی کے مقابلے میں کئی گنا زیادہ رپورٹس آرہی ہیں جسے ہم اپنے لیے ایک نیک شگون سمجھتے ہیں ۔
ہم شہری:آپ کی جو مسلح تحریک ہے خود آپ ا س کی کیسے تشریح کریں گے؟
براہمداغ بگٹی: دیکھیں ہم جو گوریلا جنگ لڑر ہے ہیں اسے دہشت گردی سے تعبیر نہ کریں۔ ہم دہشت گرد نہیں بلکہ سیاسی لوگ ہیں جن پر ایک جنگ مسلط کی گئی ہے اور ہم سیاسی مقاصد کی خاطر اپنے دفاع کی جنگ لڑ رہے ہیں۔ ہم اعتراف کرتے ہیں کہ تکنیکی اعتبار سے ہم پاکستان کی مضبوط فوج کے مقابلے میں کمزور ہیں لیکن اس کے باوجود ہم اپنی آزادی تک جدوجہد جاری رکھیں گے۔
ہم شہری: خان آف قلات میر سلیمان داؤد نے حال ہی میں ”انڈیپنڈنٹ بلوچستان کونسل“ تشکیل دی ہے۔ آپ کی اس بارے میں کیا رائے ہے؟
‘براہمداغ بگٹی: میرا خان ِ قلات کے ساتھ کوئی براہ راست رابطہ نہیں ہے لیکن میں آزاد بلوچستان کے لیے کی جانی والی تمام کوششوں کی مکمل حمایت کرتا ہوں۔
ہم شہری:حال ہی میں بلوچ ری پبلکن آرمی (بی آر اے)‘ جس کے بارے میں باور کیا جا تا ہے کہ آپ اس کی سربراہی کررہے ہیں‘ نے نصیر آباد کے علاقے میں بائیس پولیس اہل کار وں کو اغوا کرکے قتل کردیا ہے۔ اس کارروائی کا آپ کیسے دفا ع کریں گے؟
براہمداغ بگٹی :میں بی آر اے یا بی ایل اے کا سرپرست تو نہیں ہو ں لیکن میں انھیں اپنا بھا ئی سمجھتا ہوں، ان کی ہر کارروائی سے متفق ہوں اور ان کی مکمل حمایت کرتاہوں۔پولیس اہلکاروں کا اغوا اور قتل یقینا کسی سرکاری واقعے کے ردعمل میں پیش آیا ہوگا۔ شاید ہمارے دوسرے مزاحمتی بھائیوں پر ہم سے بھی زیادہ مظالم ڈھائے جارہے ہیں یا ان کی بلوچ قومی تحریک سے وابستگی ہم سے زیادہ ہو۔ لیکن آپ یہ بھی تو دیکھیں کہ یہ پولیس اہل کار جس جگہ سے اغوا ہوئے تھے وہاں کیوں گئے تھے؟ ان کا مقصد یہ تھا کہ و ہ ان بلوچوں کے خلاف کارروائی کریں جو ان کی آزادی کی جنگ لڑر ہے ہیں۔ تمام بلوچوں کو پہلے بھی تنبیہ کی گئی ہے کہ وہ پاکستان کی خدمت ترک کردیں۔ اس کے باوجود اغوا شدگا ن میں سے بہت سارے مزدوروں کو چھوڑ دیا گیا تھا۔
ہم شہری: اچھا تو اس کا مطلب ہے کہ آ پ بلوچستان میں ” ٹارگٹ کلنگ“ کی حمایت کرتے ہیں؟
;براہمداغ بگٹی: میں یہ نہیں کہوں گا کہ میں ان واقعات کی حمایت کرتا ہوں لیکن میرا ایمان ہے کہ یہ واقعات کسی عمل کے ردعمل میں پیش آ رہے ہیں ۔ میں حیران ہوں کہ کیوں جب کوئی پنجابی نائی، دھوبی یا ٹیچر مار دیا جاتا ہے توپاکستان کا پورا میڈیا جاگ اٹھتا ہے لیکن جب سکیورٹی فورسز بلوچوں کے پورے دیہاتوں کو بمباری کرکے تہس نہس کر دیتے ہیں تو ان کے حق میں ایک خبر تک رپورٹ نہیں ہوتی ؟ کیا بلوچ انسان نہیں ہیں؟ کیا ان بے گناہ شہریوں کی فو ج کے ہاتھوں ٹارگٹ کلنگ نہیں ہور ہی؟ جب ہمارا سب کچھ تباہ کردیا جاتا ہے تو کیاہم ردعمل میں کچھ کرنے میں بھی حق بجانب نہیں ہیں؟ ہمارے پاس اور کیا چارہ باقی ہے؟ حیرت ہے کہ لوگ اس عمل پر تو خاموش ہیں اور ردعمل میں جو ہوتا ہے اس پر چلا اٹھتے ہیں۔
ہم شہری: اب جب کہ آپ کے کزن میر عالی بگٹی قبیلے کے نواب بن کر ڈیرہ بگٹی پہنچ چکے ہیں تو آپ کو کیا اعتراض ہے؟
براہمداغ بگٹی: تاریخی حوالے سے دیکھیں تو بھی بلوچستان میں حکومت بلوچوں کو آپس میں لڑا کر حکمرانی کرتی رہی ہے۔ میر عالی کا نواب بننا بھی اسی سلسلے کی ایک کڑی ہے ۔شروع شروع میں تو حکومت نے وعدہ کیا تھا کہ وہ بلوچستان میں فوجی آپریشن کا خاتمہ کرے گی اور نقل مکانی کرنے والے بگٹیوں کو دوبارہ ڈیرہ بگٹی میں آباد کرے گی لیکن بے اختیار ہونے کی وجہ سے جب حکومت یہ نہ کر سکی تو انھوں نے میرعالی کو لاکر ڈیرہ بگٹی میں بیٹھا دیا۔ یہ بلوچستان کے مسئلہ کا کوئی دیرپا اور مثبت حل نہیں ہے۔ علاوہ ازیں ہم دیکھتے ہیں کہ میر عالی کو ڈیرہ بگٹی لے جانے کا تجربہ نا کام ثابت ہوگیا ہے اور یوں ان کے ڈیرہ بگٹی جانے کے بعد بھی حالات میں کوئی بہتری نہیں آئی ہے بلکہ وہاں سیکورٹی فورسز اور بلوچ مزاحمت کاروں کی طرف سے حملے بدستور جاری ہیں۔ہر روز گیس پائپ لائن اڑائی جا رہی ہیں، سکیورٹی فورسز پر حملے جاری ہیں اور راکٹ باری و بمباری کا سلسلہ ہنوز جاری ہے۔ اسی طرح حکومتی فورسز کی طرف سے پکڑ دھکڑ کا عمل متواتر جاری و ساری ہے۔ میرعالی خوف کی وجہ سے اپنے قلعے تک محصور ہو کر رہ گئے ہیں۔ اسے خود اپنے ہی قبائیلوں سے خوف آتا ہے جن کی نقل و حمل پر اس نے بڑی سختی سے پابندی لگائی ہے۔ اگر میر عالی کا واقعی ڈیر ہ بگٹی پر کنٹرول ہے اور وہ سمجھتے ہیں کہ علاقے میں اب امن ہو گیا ہے تو وہ آزاد میڈیا کو وہاں کیوں نہیں جانے دیتے ؟ میڈ یا کو چاہیے کہ وہ خود جاکر وہاں زمینی حقائق دیکھے جو کہ میر ے بیانات کی تائید کرتے ہیں کہ ڈیرہ بگٹی ا س وقت ایک ”نو گو ایر یا“ ہے۔
ہم شہری: آپ کے دادا نواب بگٹی نے اپنی زندگی میں ایک بلوچ قومی پارٹی کے قیام پر زور دیا تھا اور اب آپ پارلیمانی سیاست کے خلاف تحریک چلار ہے ہیں۔ ایساکیوں ہے کہ آپ کے طرز سیاست کی بلوچستان نیشنل پارٹی (بی این پی) اور نیشنل پارٹی حمایت نہیں کرتیں اور بلوچستان میں سنگل قومی پارٹی کا خواب شرمندہ تعبیر نہیں ہوسکا؟
براہمداغ بگٹی: میرے خیال میں اصل قوم پرستا نہ سیاست مسلح جدوجہد اور مزاحمت کی سیاست ہے۔ اگر اس وقت کوئی بلوچوں کی صیح معنوں میں ترجمانی کر رہا ہے تو یہ فریضہ وہ بلوچ سرانجام دے رہے ہیں جو پہاڑوں پر بلوچستان کی آزادی کی جنگ لڑ رہے ہیں۔ ہمیں اس بات سے کوئی فرق نہیں پڑتا کہ بی این پی اور نیشنل پارٹی ہمارے ساتھ نہیں ہیں۔ میں سمجھتا ہوں کہ نواب بگٹی نے سنگل پارٹی کا جوخواب دیکھا تھا ” بلوچ نیشنل فرنٹ“ ( دس سے زائد بلوچ جماعتوں کا اتحاد جس کے براہمداغ بگٹی چیئر مین ہیں)کی صورت میں موجود ہے۔” فرنٹ “ پاکستان سے نجات اور آزاد بلوچستان کے لیے جدو جہد کررہا ہے۔ میری بلوچ قوم سے گزارش ہے کہ وہ مسلح گروہوں کی بھر پور حمایت کریں اور مزاحمتی راستہ اپنائیں کیوں کہ اسلام آباد بلوچوں کی شناخت ختم کرنے کے درپے ہے۔
ہم شہری: کیا بلوچستان کی موجودہ مزاحمتی تحریک میں مری اور بگٹی ایک ساتھ لڑرہے ہیں یا وہ علیحدہ علیحدہ جد وجہد کررہے ہیں؟
براہمداغ بگٹی:مری ہمارے بھائی ہیں، ہمارا اور ان کا بہت ہی پرانا تعلق رہا ہے ۔ ہمارے علاقے ایک دوسرے سے نزدیک ہیں۔ہم سمجھتے ہیں کہ ہمیں ایک مشترکہ دشمن کا سامنا ہے اسی لیے ہماری بقا اس بات میں ہے کہ ہم ایک دوسرے کے مزید قریب آئیں۔ لیکن میں آپ کو یہ بتانا چاہتا ہوں کہ ہماری تحریک میں صرف مری اور بگٹی شامل نہیں بلکہ اس میں سارا بلوچستان شامل ہے۔ اس سال اپریل میں بلوچستان نیشنل موومنٹ کے چیئرمین غلام محمد بلوچ، ان کے رفقا لالہ منیر بلوچ اور شیر محمد بلوچ کو ایف سی نے اغوا کرکے ہلاک کردیا۔ ان افراد کا تعلق ایک ایسے علاقے سے ہے جہاں کوئی سردار یا نواب نہیں ہے۔ میں قبائلی نظام کا مخالف نہیں ہوں لیکن کہنے کا مقصد یہ ہے کہ آج تربت کا ضلع بھی اس تحریک میں ڈیرہ بگٹی اور کوہلو کی طر ح پیش پیش ہے۔ آج پورا بلوچستان ہمارے ساتھ مل کر آزادی کا مطالبہ کر رہا ہے۔

Baloch insurgents involved in target killings going underground: FC IG July 21, 2009
Posted by Malik Siraj Akbar in Malik Siraj Akbar.Tags: Baloch, Baloch Republican Party, Balochistan, Inspector General of Frontier Corps Major General Saleem Nawaz, Malik Siraj Akbar, Nawabzada Bramdahg Bugti, Nawabzada Hairbayar Marri, q, Quetta
3 comments
By Malik Siraj Akbar
QUETTA: Balochistan chief of the Frontier Corps (FC) Major General Saleem Nawaz has claimed that Baloch insurgents involved in target killings have now started to leave Quetta and go underground after two weeks of ‘successful deployment’ of the FC in Quetta to contain targeted killings of non-Balochs in the Baloch capital.
In an interview with this writer here at FC headquarters, the FC inspector general said all trouble in Balochistan emanated from two individuals –Bramdagh Bugti, the chief of the Baloch Republican Party (BRP) allegedly hiding in Afghanistan and Nawabzada Hairbayar Marri, a son of veteran Baloch nationalist leader Nawab Khair Baksh Marri living in London –who were stirring trouble in the province on the directives of ‘foreign elements.’
However, the FC has made “remarkable headway” in the past few months to dismantle the forces involved in target killings in Balochistan capital, Quetta, and carrying out other subversive activities. “Bramdagh is rapidly losing support among his own tribesmen after the appointment of a new tribal chief for the Bugtis,” he commented.
According to the IG, there were no ‘missing persons’ in Balochistan. “As a matter of fact all the so-called missing persons were kidnapped by Bramdagh Bugti who is now keeping them hostage back in Afghanistan in order to force the family members of these ‘missing persons’ to work for him [Bramdagh Bugti],” remarked Nawaz, who also said he was sure that former chief of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) in Balochistan John Solecki had been kidnapped by Bramdagh Bugti.
“The doors of amnesty and reconciliation are still not shut from the government’s side. If Bramdagh wants to come back as a Pakistani, I am sure the government would accommodate him in its reconciliatory process. Otherwise, no one would be allowed to take the law in his hands under any pretext,” he said.
He said the FC was a disciplined force which did not have any personal vendetta against anyone in Balochistan. “Our message is that of hope and reconciliation,” he said.
Asked about the recent assignment given to the FC by the provincial government to contain target killings in Balochistan, Nawaz said the supporters of Bramdagh Bugti had been operating against the forces in Dera Bugti district while Nawabzada Hairbayar Marri held a strong position in Kohlu area. However, when the FC cracked down on their supporters and made “tremendous success” in eliminating the elements that caused problems and blew up the national installations, these two Baloch leaders shifted their operations to Quetta, Khuzdar and Noshaki districts to target kill innocent non-Baloch people mainly teachers and professionals affiliated with the education department.
“On the request of the government of Balochistan, the FC has been deployed in Quetta city to grapple with the challenge of target killings. Since being assigned this task, FC has delivered very effectively. The local and international media has acknowledged great improvement in the state of law and order in Quetta,” he said.
DISINTEGRATION: The chief of the federal paramilitary force assured the people of Pakistan that the insurgency in Balochistan did not pose a serious threat to Pakistan as it was a ‘handful of people’ whose deprivation had been exploited by foreign elements to cause problems inside their own country while sitting outside the country.
“No one can disintegrate Pakistan merely by burning the national flag, attacking schools or targeting the national installations. The majority of the Baloch tribes are already represented in the Balochistan assembly. Around 58 members of the 65-member Balochistan Assembly come from different tribes and they have all democratically contested elections to gotten elected. So there is no threat to Pakistan at all,” he responded.
He regretted that countries supporting the international war against terrorism were not cooperative enough with Pakistan regarding the handover of Baloch leaders Bramdagh Bugti and Hairbayar Marri. “We expect these countries (without naming them) to support us fighting terrorism by asking these terrorists to leave their countries.”
They should not allow their land to be used for terrorist activities,” he appealed.
Taliban: The IG said Balochistan did not face any threats from Taliban and their supporters nor were the pro-Taliban elements hiding in any part of the province. He rejected such an impression that the Pashtoon areas of Balochistan were replete with the Taliban activists and sympathizers.
“Taliban have no support among the Pashtoons because the latter have already voted overwhelmingly for the nationalist and secular parties. They do not enjoy have any kind of political, social and religious support in the province. If they were backed by the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam then how would they attack Maulana Mohammad Khan Sherani [the head of the JUI-Fazal]?” he wondered.
PAK-AFGHAN BORDER: The FC, he added, was cognizant of its responsibilities to monitor the Pakistan-Afghanistan border in order to make sure that no one illegally entered Pakistani territory. He confessed that the FC needed more technological support from the government of Pakistan and the international community to fight the threats that were posed to the security of Balochistan from different directions.
Foreigners: Replying to a question about the growing sense of insecurity among the foreigners in Balochistan after the kidnapping of John Solecki and a French tourist – who is still missing one month after being kidnapped from Chagai district–, he said ‘ only two” foreigners had been kidnapped in Balochistan so far. Rest of the people must not panic and should come to Balochistan without any fear as the government would provide them all complete security.
Operation: He ruled out the possibility of any upcoming operations in the province either against the Baloch people or the Taliban. “Those who are airing the propaganda of an operation are in fact trying to divert public attention. They do not want us to preempt their terrorist designs. We will thwart all their intentions if the miscreants challenge the writ of the government,” he warned.
Qambar Jan tho kuja hey? July 11, 2009
Posted by Malik Siraj Akbar in Malik Siraj Akbar.Tags: Admission policy of BUITMS, Baloch, Baloch Republican Party, Baloch Students' Organization (Azad), Balochistan, Balochistan University of Inform, BRP, BSO leader goes missing, Chakar Qambarni, Chief Justice of Pakistan Ifthakar Mohammad Chaudhary, Dr. Imdad Baloch, Ghulam Mohammad Baloch, Jalil Reki, John Solecki, Kachkol Ali Baloch, Malik Siraj Akbar, Qambar Chakar, Quetta, Quota system at the BUITMS, Shahzaib Baloch, United Nations High Commission for Refugees, Zakir Majeed
24 comments

By Malik Siraj Akbar
If I have ever been truly inspired by a leader of the Baloch Students’ Organization then it is not Dr. Allah Nizar Baloch or Bashir Zaib Baloch but Qumbar Chakar. In him, I have always seen a future Ghulam Mohammad Baloch. For English readers, he was (oh sorry, is) a “super star” and for the Balochi readers, I could simply describe him as a “Blaheen Mard” (Big man).
Qambar, 20, is an extraordinary agitator, cogent speaker, deeply committed political activist and a highly organized and punctual activist who could proudly take credit for arranging most protest rallies for the restoration of quota system at the Balochistan University for Information Technology and Management Sciences (BUITMS), recovery of all the missing Balochs and several other issues.
He spoke a fluent English and made our work easier whenever a foreign journalist was in town to learn more about the Baloch students’ movement. In May 2009, I introduced him with Canadian journalist Matthieu Aikins of the National Post with whom he had a detailed interview. Qambar spoke so beautifully that Aikins started his article with a quote from him.
http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=1593832
Fresh reports suggest that this amazing Baloch activist has been whisked away by the personnel of the Frontier Corps and the intelligence agencies. They say Chakar, also an Economics student, had gone to attend classes at the City Campus of the BUITMS and latter on proceeded to the Takato Campus of the University to meet with the Vice Chancellor to speak about the issue of the district-based open merit admission policy. On his return from the college, Chakar, who was accompanied by five other friends of his hailing from the Baloch Action Committee, was stopped at Chaman Pattick area by a convey of security forces.
“They (personnel of the security forces) had come in eight vehicles and asked Qambar to get out of the Alto car,” said one eyewitness, “once Qambar walked towards them, we saw them putting a hand grenade in Qambar’s pocket.” According to the eyewitness, the FC officials shouted at Qambar pointing at the hand grenade: “What the hell is this? You Baloch terrorist! We have to take you in custody.” They slapped, manhandled Qambar and took him away to an unknown location while sparing his other colleagues.
Pakistan’s most prominent newspaper, Jang, this morning reports, though very briefly, that a BSO activist has been arrested by the police while carrying a hand grenade.
One close friend of Qambar says if latter was truly carrying a hand grenade with him then how he could not be caught by the security scanners installed at the BUITMS where the Baloch student had gone to meet with the Vice Chancellor.
However, such tactics no longer surprise anyone. We all know the nature of the ridiculous cases the state functionaries have made in the past against the Baloch people in this militarized province. We do not have a short memory to recollect how Dr. Imdad Baloch, a former chairman of the BSO, and his colleagues were resurfaced after seven months of disappearance in 2005. They were implicated in a case of stealing a washing machine somewhere in Dera Ghazi Khan while they had never visited DG Khan in their whole life time.
Presently, no one knows the whereabouts of Qambar Chakar. It is believed that he is being detained by the FC and the intelligence agencies in one of the torture cells where, according to the Baloch nationalists, around five thousand Balochs, including more than a hundred women, are languishing simply because of their dissenting views.
“We strongly denounce the extra judicial arrest of the Baloch student,” said Kachkol Ali Baloch, Balochistan’s former leader of the opposition. “The State is taking benefit of our powerlessness. Our leaders are being brutally killed and younger ones are being subjected to enforced disappearance by the state agencies. We call for a UN intervention in Balochistan.”
In fact, the issue of enforced disappearances in Balochistan has remarkably intensified with the arrival of an utterly powerless Pakistan People’s Party government following the historic general elections of February 2008. It clearly seems that the hawkish Punjabi Establishment based in Islamabad is still unwilling to relinquish powers in Balochistan.
The resource-rich province is still under the control of the army and the intelligence agencies that indulge in grave violation of human rights. Ironically, most human rights organizations operating in Pakistan deliberately snub their illegal operations in the country’s largest province for the reason that they do not want their funding to be stopped. The national media and human rights organizations have also skirted the plight of the Baloch since the arrival of the PPP government.
The extra-judicial arrest of the Baloch political leaders, mainly the political activists, has been taking place very systematically. There is not an iota of doubt that the establishment wants to eliminate or enervate the Baloch movement by all possible means. Islamabad wishes to subjugate the Baloch people to such an extent that they give up their demand for self-rule. Such tactics, I am surely, are only going to increase anti-Pakistan sentiments among the Baloch youth.
Qambar Chakar’s abduction is not accidental. It was surely preplanned. Previously, the central vice chairman of the BSO, Zakir Majeed Baloch, was arrested and taken to an unknown location in a similar attempt. Likewise, another key leader of the BSO, Shahzaib Baloch, who presides over the Quetta chapter of the organization, was arrested in April and kept in illegal solitary confinement for more than two months. The most pathetic thing about such official behavior is the denial of judicial justice to these ‘missing persons’. They are not produced before any court of law to prove their innocence.
The list of the missing persons does not end here. Among the fresh victims, two prominent names are that of Jalil Rekhi, the central information secretary of the Baloch Republican Party (BRP) and Chakar Qambarani, a member of the BRP central committee. They have been missing for more than five months now.
It is highly regrettable that the restored Chief Justice of Pakistan Mr. Justice Ifthakar Chaudhary, who was believed to be sacked by former military dictator General Pervez Musharraf due to his proactive role in recovering the missing persons, has taken a U-turn in his approach towards the missing persons. The Chief Justice of Pakistan has not only softened his attitude but also completely skirted the plight of the Baloch youth who are illegally pushed into torture cells and subjected to inhuman treatment.
Mr. Chaudhary, is this what millions of people in Pakistan marched for? No Sir. They wanted the restoration of a man who had the spunk to bring the intelligence agencies under control. If you fail to deliver justice then your opponents certainly get an opportunity to say that you politicized your suspension merely to gain personal popularity. I know you did.
The international community, mainly the human rights organizations, have to take notice of the unabated violation of human rights in Balochistan. The main reason for the kidnapping of the American head of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR), John Solecki, in February this year was predominantly the issue of ‘missing persons.’ The people of Balochistan are tired of the state repression. Their beloved ones are going missing every other day. The international community did not stand up to its promises with the Baloch people regarding the issue of enforced disappearances while negotiating with the Baloch leadership about the release of John Solecki.
In the meanwhile, the Baloch students, who tried to protest the extra-judicial arrest of Qambar Chakar, were shelled by the police this morning at BUITMS. Qambar Chakar deserves a good response from his political friends. While free, he had actively campaigned for the release of everyone. It is the time everyone joined the rallies being organized for Chakar’s release. Qambar is a man of high spirits. He had told me many times that he knew that the intelligence agencies and the FC were chasing him.
When I asked him for a meeting last time so that I could write a story on Zakir Majeed, he said he was willing to meet me anywhere I wanted. “What about the Press Club,” I asked. He laughed and said, “but the press club is surrounded by ‘their men’,” as he referred to the agents of the agencies. I said okay we could sit somewhere safe. He said he was not afraid of coming downtown. It was just he had begun to take precautionary measures to ensure his own security. I said it was a very wise decision.We wish young Qambar Chakar all the best. He is a brave boy. He surely knows that “ah pa sarani goda ga….”
Kalpars accept responsibility for killing Mureed Bugti June 24, 2009
Posted by Malik Siraj Akbar in Malik Siraj Akbar.Tags: Baloch, Baloch Republican Party, Balochistan, BRP, Malik Siraj Akbar, Mir Aali Bugti, Mureed Bugti, Nawabzada Bramdagh Bugti, Quetta, Wadera Khair Din
1 comment so far
By Malik Siraj Akbar
Dispelling the allegations of the Baloch Republican Party (BRP) against the government and the loyalists of Mir Aali Bugti for the killing of its central committee member Mureed Bugti on June 19, a spokesman for the Kaplar clan of Bugti tribe on Tues accepted responsibility for the controversial assassination.
Wadera Khair Din, a spokesman for the Kalpar Bugtis, telephoned the media and said Mureed Bugti had been killed to take revenge as a part of the Balochi traditions against the murder of innocent people which Mureed had sponsored in his life time. He condemned the BRP for terming the recent killing as a case of political killing and resorting to shutter down strike calls across Balochistan.
“BRP is fooling the people of Balochistan. Mureed Bugti was not a political leader but a source of lawlessness and constant trouble in the area by continuously carrying out terrorist activities,” he said.
The spokesman said Mureed Bugti,50, was responsible for the killing of hundreds of people in Dera Bugti, Jaffarabad and Naseerabad by sponsoring bomb blasts, landmine explosions and other forms of terrorism. “He [Mureed Bugti] carried out attacks against my family at least six times. In a landmine blast sponsored by him, my brother Shah Gul and nephew Gul Baig were killed. Therefore, we decided to avenge the murder of our men by killing Mureed Bugti. There is no politics involved but tribal revenge was taken,” he added.
On its part, the BRP, headed by late Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti’s grandson Nawabzada Bramdagh Bugti, had billed the killing of Mureed Bugti as a case of target killing of political opponents. The BRP, which accused the force of Bugti tribal chief Mir Aali Bugti and the security forces for the killing, had also called for a Balochistan-wide shutter down and wheel jam strike on Sunday which was responded positively in the Baloch-dominated areas of the province. The BRP had stated that the killing of its leader was a continuity of the target killing of three Baloch leaders in Mekran in April.
The spokesman for the Kalpars said some elements were trying to cause law and order problems in Balochistan under the pretext of fighting for the rights of Baloch people and the liberation of Balochistan. “There are some people fighting for economic gains. The idea of an independent Balochistan is just a means of playing politics and giving a political touch to a murder that was carried out purely on the basis of tribal reasons is incorrect,” he remarked.


